In Black Mirror's "White
Bear," the line between justice and entertainment becomes blurred, as the
actors of White Bear Justice Park profit of off the "criminal."
In “White Bear” the guilty party is
punished in an unconventional way and every aspect of her punishment is meant
to mirror the crime committed. This is because the actors and participants are
trying to place Victoria in the shoes of her victim. For instance, Victoria
herself is meant to represent the little girl, as her memory is artificially
reset each day, making her innocent in a way; she is forced to wonder why she
has to endure such hell when she wakes up, what she has done to deserve it, and
why no one is helping her. The audience represents Victoria, not the Victoria
we see in the episode, but Victoria who filmed and acted as an accomplice to
the crime, claiming that she was under her boyfriend’s spell. The mentally
incapacitating signal represents Victoria’s dead boyfriend, who, as Victoria
says, entranced her and encouraged her to film such a heinous crime. Because Victoria’s
boyfriend hangs himself before being put on trial, all of the blame for the
little girl’s death falls on Victoria.
Leaving out the crime in the
beginning of the episode allows the viewers to sympathize with Victoria,
painting her solely as a victim, rather than a criminal as well. Though I
disagree with the crime that she helped commit, and though I think that a
punishment of some sort was appropriate, I find it disturbing that the
participants of this simulation walked in with the impression that she deserved
to be physically and mentally tortured every day for a crime that she did not
even remember committing. The rules of this “park,” revealed at the episode’s
end, are also disturbing, one in particular which instructed the audience to enjoy
themselves, which is odd considering that the entire purpose of a park is to
have fun; I find this rule to be disturbing because it implies that any feelings
towards Victoria’s punishment other than joy, relief, or others along those
lines are taboo and out of place and that to reject this extreme punishment is
to advocate for a pardon of her actions to an extent.
My problem with this episode is
that I never saw any substantial evidence that the claims made against Victoria’s
character are true, but instead they are made and perpetuated by people who
were not initially involved with the crime. The tourists in the justice park
are much like a jury, who rely on a set of facts given to them to form their
own opinions of a given situation. Not to mention that the guilty party is
having her memory wiped clean every day, so she does not even have the
opportunity to defend herself or provide the audience with her side of the
story because she has zero memory of what happened. I do not find this punishment
to be fitting to the crime at all, seeing as how she is not only tortured and publicly
humiliated every day until her trial, but also how she still has to be
officially sentenced by a judge. Punishments/sentences are meant to
rehabilitate, not just humiliate. By forcing Victoria to relive this experience
every day, she does not have the opportunity to reflect upon her actions and
consider her role in this whole ordeal, nor does she have an opportunity to
become a better person, because in her mind she was innocent to begin with. Without her memory, the Victoria being punished in the episode may as well be a different person from the one who had all her faculties, filming and participating in a crime..
The most frightening and disturbing
aspect of this episode is how closely it (among others) resembles real life in
the west and the way that we profit off of this sort of treatment, ignoring the
humanity of others. I suppose that is why the show is titled Black Mirror, because it is supposed to reflect
the worst, darkest parts of our society.
2 comments:
Well said i agree that with this concept there is no chance at rehabilitation, and the line of enjoy yourself truly is sicking and repulsive and its a very vile concept that the idea of torture as entertainment could be thought of as an enjoyable experience
Amy:
I'm not sure if the public is "demented" as much as they are simply desensitized. Most people do not derive pleasure from the suffering of other people (although there are exceptions in cases of Sadists, Sociopaths, Psychopaths, and other mentally "damaged" people). However, this predisposition can be overridden if they are seduced by their emotions- if they are seeking vengeance or "justice", a person will be more likely to revel in the suffering of another person if they feel that person "deserves" it. In a sense, it is almost like people feel a sense of duty: they have to make sure that person "pays" for his or her crime.
Post a Comment