
Pretending, imagination, creativity, and day dreaming, all of these activities are taught to children. As adults, a more sophisticated version of these activities are collectively referred to as fantasizing. Envisionments of past, present, and futures, such as, board meetings, wedding days, vacations, the perfect mate, and dream homes are all fantasized about. Without these techniques you'd not be in college today with an idea of your future plans. These skills are also used as coping mechanisms. Used to cope with disappointments in lives. During the loss of a loved one, they serve as an aide in having the opportunity to say those last goodbyes, or a way to still have a connection to that person lost. Although, many will not admit to a preoccupation with the time spent fantasizing of a reconciliation with a lost loved one, it is a prevalent reality of many.
For some the desperation of reconnecting with a loved one is so great they would go to any extreme to reconnect with the one they've lost. Although, I think many would have hesitations. I also believe their hesitations may not be strong enough to discourage their willingness to go to these extremes. There hesitations would include the fear of what others would think, the uncertainty of the replica being able to fully duplicate their loved one's personality, a feeling of awkwardness of that strangeness of the interacting with the dead, even though it's only a replicate of the dead.
I do feel that the even more complex ethical component is the vulnerability of the persons that these replicas are being created for. People faced with death of a loved one are at their most vulnerable times in life and not completely rational individuals. They would be very easily taken advantage of in these situations. So the question truly is "Is it ethical to use the desperation of others to advance the profits of the companies supplying these replicas of their loved ones?"
I do however feel, that even something as bizarre as this sounds to us today, it could be as commonplace as a cell phone is to us in the future. For we are an ever advancing, ever changing, ever accepting, ever adapting generation.
2 comments:
Amy:
Well, in response to your statement, "Is it ethical to use the desperation of others to advance the profits of the companies supplying these replicas of their loved ones?", there are several businesses already that profit off of similar subjects— think of funeral homes, news stations, clothing stores, even churches (on some level). However I'm going to assume that by "ethical" you mean the psychological harm and dependence that these companies can cause people. In these cases I would have to agree that the practice, in and of itself, is unethical.
Thank you for your response that was my point that people are vulnerable at times after death and easily persuaded to make decisions that they may not make during a time not under the same duress
Post a Comment