The class debate was this; Why or why not was Ash creepy to
you?
This is a hypothetical conversation held by two people named
Extremely Confused Self and Unconfused Self. Unconfused self represents my
rationalization of the arguments being presented, and Extremely Confused Self
represents the arguments that sprung to mind while developing an opinion on Ash’s
technology.
This conversation starts after Dr Johnson argues that Ash
was only weird because we are not used to him yet.
********
“Professor Johnson has a point, " Unconfused Self Started. " Why is it that connect with
our loved ones would be ostracized as though
it were more unnatural than say … using still photographs and or voice messages
to connect with our dead loved ones?
Extremely Confused Self responded, “Well it’s because Ash
the ugly robot thing was right there in her face which makes him a bid absurd
don’t you think?”
Unconfused Self paused for a moment to ponder this statement
before replying.
“First of all, Ash
was quite handsome for a replica. Secondly, I believe it to be of human kind’s
dearest interest, to rid ourselves of this tendency to put things up in the
attic (pun ) for being “absurd”.
Extremely Confused Self fell silent while Unconfused Self launched
into yet another tangent.
“The word absurd is defined
as having no rational or orderly relationship to human life.
I would like to point out that Ash technically fit into this
category. He was rational in the sense that his presence could be explained or
reasoned to another human being, which we began to see towards the end as Ash
was introduced to the daughter. One could assume that this is because his
technology was becoming accepted in the society.
One might also argue that Ash’s technology was still not “
rational “ because he was not accepted. The main character DID hide him in the attic instead of displaying
him in her window like a Christmas tree, and it is somewhat implied that he is still taboo, despite the daughter's limited access to him.
Although that is a fair point, I encourage those who take that
argument to ask yourself, is every thing that is rational displayed ? Are new ideas always seen as rational at first
before they prove themselves to be quite the opposite?
Think about the laws of gravity. At the time I am sure that Newton’s
ideas were seen as “absurd “, and certainly no one who may have slightly agreed
with him was shouting their allegiance with him from the rooftops. It is the
same with 3d technology, if not worse. Physical manifestations of ideas ( aka
technology ) are harder to integrate into the world’s laws of what is rational and what is not due to the time it takes to
test and assess results and testimonies of the targeted manifestation. The title of absurdity or weirdness is not given to its
true heir, but rather to anything that has not yet been introduced or is not
yet understood. And furthermore… “
Extremely Confused Self interjected , “No ! Ash was absurd
because he WAS truly irrational. How can a robot meant to imitate the dead be rational at all ?
“
Unconfused Self asked, “Imitation is not irrational, as
long as it is stated clearly that it is in fact just that ... an imitation. Ash’s robot was very open
about his true nature , and never tried to trick the main character into
believing he was anything other than what he was. "
“ Well what about that time he started crying on top of the
cliff?”
“ You can’t really consider
that as an unclear imitation. He only showed that much emotion because his
activator told him that he was being unlike Ash,” was the reply.
“ So that mans he faked it ! “
“ No that means that he obediently served his purpose. Her response
to him does not change his rationality, it only intensifies the story line.
Also , how is a machine
that is meant to imitate the living any more rational? Is that idea not WORSE
if anything since they will inevitably replace our drive to perform our natural
abilities? … “ Unconfused Self concluded.
“ That is actually a good question …” Extremely Confused
Self agreed.
2 comments:
I like how you showed your exact thought process during the discussion of the episode. Very interesting perspective to take.
I agree with Triston Gillon when he says this is an interesting perspective to take. It's a creative way to portray your feelings towards Ash 2 with two "personas". As you were explaining rationale, I could see how you were trying to make sense of the Android's purpose and function. Who knows? Maybe in time, what it is seen as absurd will be something eventually seen as sensible.
Post a Comment