When a
crime is committed in the United States, our legal system is designed to
provide justice to the victims of those crimes.
Our justice system designates appropriate punishments as determined by
the trial of the criminal. The
punishments are also handed out in accordance with the constitution which
designates no cruel or unusual punishments for the criminals. In the Black Mirror episode White Bear, the
main character and criminal, Victoria, is handed what some may consider both a
cruel and unusual punishment. Victoria
is convicted of torturing and killing a young girl named Jemima along with her
boyfriend Iain. The punishment that
Victoria is given is to become a part of an amusement park of sorts in which
she is tortured every day in the same exact fashion; however her memory is
erased at the end of each day and thus has no memory of ever being tortured
when she wakes up in the morning. This
form of punishment is not justice.
Justice in this sense as they are trying to deliver it is in the form of
an eye for an eye. Because Victoria
tortured Jemima, Victoria was then sentenced to also be tortured. The way in which Victoria is tortured then,
is not an eye for an eye because Victoria is tortured continuously day after
day. Jemima was tortured only once. The fact that Victoria does not remember
being tortured does not take away the physical trauma and stress that her body
experiences every day due to the proceedings.
In that sense then, the punishment is not equal to the crime. It is
excessive at least as a punishment due to the torture of Jemima. The killing of Jemima then would justify the
death penalty for Victoria. Thus an
appropriate punishment for Victoria would be to be tortured for the time that
Jemima was tortured, and then to be put to death. This punishment could be appropriately called
and eye for an eye.
A key
aspect about the crime that Victoria committed however is that Victoria only
filmed the crime being committed. This
raises the question of whether punishing Victoria in the way that she is, is
really justifiable. I don’t think that
Victoria is handed down the appropriate punishment for her crime. Had she herself taken part in the torturing
of Jemima then the punishment would be appropriate; however, as the crime is
described in the episode, her punishment does not fit her crime. The fact that she made the case that she was
coerced to partake in the crime by her boyfriend seemed to have almost no
significance in the punishment. This
form of justice system could potentially get out of hand very quickly and may
be punishing people in a way that is disproportionate to the crime they
committed.
3 comments:
I agree with your comments about the american justice system and how this form of justice portrayed in the episode is unjust. However, I disagree with your reasoning behind her punishment being justifiable. The reason she is treated the way that she is, is so that she can experience what Jemima experienced. People videoing her misery the way Jemima was videoed by Victoria. No one helped Jemima, no one is helping Victoria. Victoria went along with Ian's plan the way she goes along with the camo girl's plan, then ends up being set up. Regardless of the "just" question, the punishment is justifiable in the sense that it is eye for an eye. She is experiencing pain according to Jemima's.
I would have to agree with both of you guys about the justice system here in the United States.However, my question would be is an eye for an eye actually just? If it is, wouldn't that be cruel punishment?
I would have to agree with both of you guys about the justice system here in the United States.However, my question would be is an eye for an eye actually just? If it is, wouldn't that be cruel punishment?
Post a Comment