Pages

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

Lyfe Guide Presentation Review

                Group 3 of my moral issues class presented a custom website named Lyfe Guide this Monday. It is a website that is built specifically for teenagers and young adults who are trying to take on the grips and responsibilities of life fresh out of school. This included insurance, job searches, car purchases, budgeting, loans, and financial aid. The site would pair you with an adviser to help you in whatever situation you may be stuck in. This would occur via telephone, and the first set of advisers was the presenters of the group since it is a startup company.
                I think this is a wonderful concept. Such an excessive number of today’s youth go out into the “real world” unprepared and blind-sided by the reality of life’s struggles and ways to combat them. This site grants an efficient solution and it is for free. This brings me to the first problem with this project. The funding and the amount of work necessary to run this outfit faces a huge gap in my opinion. The advisors required need expertise in at least one of the areas help is available which is easily at least 50 thousand dollars a year. That number goes up with each additional area a person is an expert in. The site’s main source of income is ad revenue and donations. This can only support the salary of a limited number of workers while still paying for the site domain, insurance, general expenses such as bills, and so forth. The finances just do not add up, but this does not take away from the integrity of the project.

                I would use this site for several reasons. For one, I already know a little bit about each of the categories assistance is offered in, but more knowledge could not do me any harm because I want to know as much as possible. Secondly, it’s free. I feel that’s enough said. The advice should be taken with a grain salt at all times though because humans are prone to err intentionally and unintentionally. Dr. J even brought this up and I think that is a concern that all companies must take the risk of acing. Not everyone is going to uphold the reputation of a company the way the managing executives would hope. This doesn’t make it an inherently bad company even though the misconduct is a direct representation of the company. All franchises employ hundreds of people, and all of those people have free will. The possibility of fraudulent, disrespectful, bias, racist, and/or insensitive information being presented will always be there, and I don’t think there is much that can be done about it aside from signing a contract stating you won’t do so. Even then, however, you are only holding them accountable, but not eliminating the possibility.

No comments: