Pages

Monday, April 10, 2017

A new inception for punishment


This week we had a film screening from Black Mirror titled “White Bear”.  In the beginning, we are presented with Victoria, a woman who wakes up in an apartment alone with no recollection of what she is doing there. Based on the bandages on her wrist and the pills on the floor we can conclude that she is recovering from an attempted suicide. She wakes up to a society who has been brainwashed into filming everything as bystanders, where only a few are immune. She and two others are being hunted by individuals who find pleasure in torture while others watch. Her companion plans to destroy “White Bear”, the facility that holds the unwanted transmitted signal. We are asked to sympathize with someone who is just like a lost child in need of saving. But then the story changes, turns out Victoria was the accomplice for the murder of a child. The child she assumed was hers was murdered by her husband while she filmed it. The country was outraged, Victoria’s husband committed suicide, and she is tortured every day in “White Bear” (a “justice” park). This is a scenario where the crime committed equals the punishment. Just like the child, Victoria is being recorded by strangers while she is being terrorized.

              This all concludes to a film that poses more questions than answers. Is this truly justice and can she really learn her lesson? Victoria cannot repent for what she did when every night her memory is being erased. Her mind has been erased so many times that the crime is barely a memory, if that. Because her memory has been fried, is she even the same person that she once was? I would argue that she is. While she may have no memory, her body and soul are still the same. Throughout the film, she shows tendency that are still self-centered, like when she left the guy behind in the store without looking back. Most important, is this form of punishment ethical and an intentional injustice? What happens to those who watch her torture?  They are told to “enjoy yourself” as if it were a theme park. The audience (adults and children) is paying to be there, and they seem to be indifference to her torture.  By witnessing, and taking pleasure form her suffering, they are no better than Victoria. While it is profitable for the park owners they cannot continue this forever. Eventually her body will not be able to keep up with the physical and mental abuse.  “White Bear” = a punishment worse than death

Inspired by the Moors murders in the 1960s


4 comments:

Unknown said...

I agree that her mind can only take so much mind erasing, but I think that she isn't the same person once her mind is erased. She only showed selfish tendencies because she thought it was a survival situation. Other than that, she was a completely new person.

Beverly Agsaulio said...

I agree with the fact that its wrong for these people to have pleasure from her torture. That park is so bad! regardless if its a punishment, i think its wrong for other to have pleasure from that.

Unknown said...

I agree that "White Bear" Park is a bad environment for the children. They are basically encouraging pleasure in torture. I don't think this punishment is ethical at all. I believe that she was a different person from the moment they erased her memory but you are right that her body will probably not be able to take it any longer.

Unknown said...

yes you are right in many aspects but after this situation, she is not the same person. Even if she change a little, is a change and with this much trauma she certainty did. also jasmine is right, when she does the selfish did , it was done out of survival. People do that all the time and is being proven" the good Samaritan" experiment is the prove to that. people are prone to help according to circumstances and risking your life is not one of them.