In the
episode of Black Mirror, “White Bear,” I was introduced to Veronica and a
unique situation. This started as a very confusing episode with a confused Veronica
not knowing anything about herself at all. She goes through the whole day
dealing with onlookers and attackers with this lady who presented herself as
ally. It all culminates with Veronica finding out that she is being punished
for kidnapping a little girl with her significant other and watching and
recording while he tortured the kid to death. Her memory would then be wiped
and the entire scene would be reset and she would go through this hellacious cycle
again and again.
This
raises the question if Victoria’s sentence is even just anymore. After much
assessment and discussing in class, I decided that whatever is the equivalent
of the judicial system in “White Bear’s” fictional world is focused on
punishment rather than rehabilitation. This is evident at the end of the
episode when Victoria’s seen expressing genuine remorse to the point that she
even prefers death than to live through things again. However, this is
neglected and everything is reset all again. I think this is where the
punishment becomes unjust. Victoria clearly sees the error of her ways, and if
she were released from captivity, she’d have a PTSD panic attack if she even
tried to snatch another child because she was put through a traumatic
experience.
Furthermore,
the fact that Victoria’s suffering was monetized makes matters murky.
Punishment should be for the sake of the punished’s retribution and rehabilitation,
not the punisher’s gain and advantage. This makes motives questionable. Are
they really trying to get Veronica to see the error of her ways, or are they
capitalizing on a way to turn people’s hate for child murderers into a payday?
This is exactly why Kant believed morality was focused in the motive of the
action instead of the action itself. It could be possible that the masterminds
behind Victoria’s punishment care nothing about the fact that she spectate a
child’s anguish and homicide.
Lastly,
the most questionable about all of this is if they’re punishing the right “Veronica.”
With her memory cleared about everything, is she still the Veronica that was
with her significant other when the terrible incident occurred? I think not. I
think the “wiped Veronica” is a version of Veronica had she never met Ian and
fallen under his spell to hurt kids. She has the same name, body, and
appearance, but her conscious is different. If they wiped her and she went and
snatched a kid again even without Ian then that would be proof that she is just
a horrible person regardless. However, “wiped Veronica” showed a moral standing
in “White Bear” that suggests she wouldn’t do such a thing.
1 comment:
Tyler,
I agree with you where you believe that this punishment is inhumane and wrong. However, I disagree with you that the purpose of prison and other forms of punishment are for rehabilitation for the prisoners. I think that prison is meant to punish others (in a humane way) to make sure they would not commit the crime again if they were released. I think that maybe if the person is in prison long enough they can realize what they have done and make amends on their own, but that has to be their own decision and their own change of heart. What do you think should have been the right form of punishment? Do you think that they could have done this once to her to get the point across or do you think it should not have been done at all?
Post a Comment