If you had the chance to bring back someone you loved, would
you? The answer to this question seems obvious; most of us would immediately
respond to the question with an emphatic
yes. However, everything may not be as it seems. In Be Right Back, we see a mourning woman order a nearly-identical
robot simulation of her recently deceased boyfriend. However, she very quickly
finds herself hating the android as much as she loved the original Ash. Where
does her anger come from? What is it about the reproduction Ash that so
repulses her? And can we really say that this android is truly Ash?
When Ash2 is first activated, Martha is overcome with
emotion at seeing her beloved again. However, joy is far from the emotion we see
expressed in her behavior in this scene. She is at first shocked, and perhaps
even disturbed. She mentions that he looks like the original Ash (Ash1) “on a
good day”. She also cannot decide whether she is bothered by the fact that Ash2
doesn’t have fingerprints. Martha seems more shocked and confused about how she
feels about this android than she seems relieved to have her loved one back, or
even that she holds any love for this machine at all.
As time progresses, Martha attempts to re-establish her
former life with Ash2 attempting to fill the place Ash1 held. However, despite
their combined efforts, nothing seems to sit quite right with Martha. She
becomes increasingly more disturbed by the differences between Ash2 and Ash1.
Ash2 doesn’t breathe. He cuts his hand on glass and neither bleeds nor seems to
feel any pain. While having sex, he shows no personal investment in the
proceedings beyond performing his duty of imitating Ash1. Eventually, Martha
becomes so disturbed by his so-close-but-not-exactly-right performance of Ah1
that she comes very close to destroying Ash2.
Martha got sucked into the program because the original
computer software was a good enough imitation of Ash1 that she truly felt that
Ah1 was still there, barring the occasional misstep of Ash2. However, as time
went on and she delved deeper into the program, she became increasingly aware
of the important aspects of Ash1 that were missing in Ash2. Ash2 not only
failed to display certain behaviors that were characteristic of Ash1, but
failed to truly emulate human life at all in his complete disregard for his own
feelings… if he even had any to begin with. I think it is likely he didn’t,
only possessing the means to replicate the physical behaviors that accompany
emotions in humans – or organic humans, perhaps I should say. I feel, and to an
extent I think Martha would agree, that due to these significant differences,
we cannot say that Ash2 is the “real” Ash, as in Ash1.
By the end of the episode, Martha was aware of enough
difference between Ash1 and Ash2 to no longer find comfort in Ash2’s presence,
but neither could she see enough difference to make herself let go of the android.
The episode ends with her stuck with the ghost of her love, not quite alive but
not quite dead either, haunting her attic and refusing to let her truly move on
with her life, even a decade later.
2 comments:
I agree with the point you made about Martha rejecting Ash2 because it never fully imitated Ash1. Ash 2 can not fully replicate the imperfections of humanity. I also thought that another way to answer your first question would be that Ash 2 is only the mechanical version of Ash1. It may do things better, and it might have the same name, but it is limited to functioning like a machine. I think Kaunt would say that he is not human because he is not free. This is shown when he mentions to Martha that he has to be close to where she is or near his activation point.
I definitely agree with all that you said. Ash II turned out to be much more different than Ash I and Martha was displeased.
Post a Comment